Concept
of Operations for the DCMA Small Business Center
(INFORMATION)
1. Risk
Planning
1.1. Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) personnel should communicate the opportunities of the Mentor-Protégé
Program during regular contractor and customer discussions.
1.2. Once a
Mentor-Protégé Agreement is received and/or included on the OSD Office of Small Business
Program (OSBP) list of agreements, the
DCMAC-C Mentor-Protégé Division (DCMAC-CP) should include it in planning considerations.
This is because Agreements are for a term of one to three years
with possible extension up to two additional years.
1.3. DCMAC-CP personnel will confer with OSD
OSBP personnel
for validation of the list of active and post agreements to be addressed.
1.4. DCMAC-CP reviews the list of agreements, verify the agreements have been
received, and advise the Service activities and/or OSD OSBP of any concerns, updates, or omissions in
the agreement list.
1.5. A listing of the mentors and protégés where DCMA does not have administrative cognizance
will be provided to the OSD OSBP.
1.6 The DCMAC-CP Division Chief will
advise the OSD OSBP of specific issues with the list of agreements and mentor
sites that are not under DCMA cognizance and address reimbursement.
2. Risk
Assessment
2.1.
Receive and review the Mentor-Protégé agreement, the
Mentor quarterly report, and the DoD
semi-annual reports.
2.1.1 Agreements approved before Oct 1,
2005: Two quarterly
reports are to be submitted by the mentor two weeks after the close of the
period. Two DoD
semiannual
reports are to be submitted by the mentor for
the following periods of performance: October 1 through March 31and April 1 through September 30 of
each FY. The DoD semiannual reports should be received by
the DCMAC-CP Program Manager no later than April 30 and October 31.
2.1.2 Agreements approved after
Oct 1, 2005: Two quarterly reports are to be
submitted by the mentor two weeks after the close of the
period. Two DoD
semiannual reports are to be
submitted by the mentor at
the six and twelve month timeframe. All
reports are due based on the approval date or contract funding date for the specific period of
performance of the agreement. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager verifies that the mentor's most current completed
semi-annual report is obtained, including the protégé's
concurrence/rebuttal to the report,
and reviews all documents prior to the scheduled
review. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager notifies the Mentor of the required
submission prior to their due dates and reaffirms the
final receipt date. The DCMAC-CP
Program Manger ensures all
sections are complete.
2.2. Risk
assessment includes determining what type of audit or
review should be performed based on the risk rating. Risk
ratings should be determined, in part, by considering
the type of agreement (Reimbursable or Credit), the year of the Mentor-Protégé Agreement, assessing
the quarterly reports and the prior year performance (if applicable). Risk
assessment also includes consideration of whether there
is an advance agreement on the treatment of development
costs for either credit or reimbursable
agreements. The following are approaches to risk
assessment:
- High
Risk: On-site
reviews should be scheduled within 60 days of
high-risk determination.
- Moderate
Risk: On-site reviews should be scheduled within
the review period for reimbursable agreements and
virtual reviews for credit agreements.
- Low
Risk: Either
virtual or on-site performance reviews should be
scheduled, as deemed necessary. Verification of data
and progress is still required although interviews may be telephonic.
2.3. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager
will establish a
schedule for the mentor and protégé reviews with
completion dates for their assigned workload. Mentor-protégé performance reviews should be
coordinated with other on-site activities to maximize
field resources. The DCMAC-CP Program
Manager should schedule discussions with each
protégé, for the purpose of validating the data and
effort for the given FY under the Mentor-Protégé
agreement.
The DCMAC-CP Program
Manager will request a Defense Contract Audit
Agency (DCAA) audit for all reimbursable agreements. The DCMAC-CP Program
Manager assesses whether a meeting with the Mentor and the
Protégé is required or if a virtual review should suffice.
2.4.
The DCMAC-CP Program Manager advises the Mentor of the review schedule
in order to facilitate the review process and avoid
undue delays.
2.5.
The DCMAC-CP Program Manager performs the review
of the protégé, reviewing the semi-annual report for
completeness and
verifies the
progress made by the protégé during the developmental
period of the agreement. Feedback
information from the protégés on how the agreement is
proceeding, including verification of milestone
achievement should be solicited and included in the
annual report. For
example, if the protégé reports that no benefits were obtained from the agreement and the mentor reports
incurring $500,000 in costs, then this inconsistency
should be highlighted in the report for further review.
2.6.
The DCMAC-CP Program Manager should utilize
the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), to verify the reimbursable and credit
agreement costs or credits reported by the mentor in
year one at a minimum and every year thereafter should
the Mentor-Protégé Agreement be rated as either moderate
or high risk. All
Mentor-Protégé Agreements should have a DCAA audit to
determine the total final costs or credits
incurred.
2.6.1. The
results of the protégé review should be provided
to DCAA when requesting audit
assistance.
2.6.2. Audits performed determine if costs or credits
were reasonably incurred as reported by the mentor in
the semi-annual report. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager determines whether costs or credits are allocated in
accordance with the mentor's approved accounting
practices.
2.7. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager should conduct an annual on-site exit conference on the state of the
Agreement with the mentor at the conclusion of the
review or during the reporting period for all Agreements
rated moderate or high risk. We do this
to discuss findings prior to the final report. Telephone exit
conferences may be appropriate for Agreements rated as
low risk. The details of the exit conference
and recommendations for corrective action should be
included in the Annual Review and Executive Summary for DoD Mentor-Protégé
Agreements.
2.8. If
problems are noted in the quarterly reports, semi-annual
report or DCAA audit, the DCMAC-CP Program Manager should work
with the mentor to assist in resolving problems, except for Agreements where DCMA has no administration of the
underlying contract. For these Agreements, DCMA
should submit the facts in the report with recommendations
for corrections.
2.9. The DCMAC-CP Program Manager
will notify the cognizant Service Activity and the DCMAC-CP,
Mentor-Protégé Division Chief of issues impacting the
Mentor-Protégé Agreement.
2.10 The DCMAC-CP Program Manager should also verify the accuracy of
protégé data on employment, revenues, and participation
in DoD contracts for the two year period after the developmental period ends utilizing the Protégé Post Agreement Review Form. If data is
either not provided, or is not verifiable, the report
should still be completed outlining the reason that such
verification could not be performed. The report
period is for two consecutive years starting
with the end date of the agreement . Does not
apply to Protégés that enter another agreement
with a new Mentor or agreements that have been
terminated.
2.11.
Proposed Credit Agreements will be reviewed for
completeness and returned for any
additional documentation, if required, within ten
working days of receipt from the Mentor.
2.12.
Approval Letters will be sent to Mentor, OSD, OSBP and
DCMAC-CP Program
Manager within thirty days of receipt of complete
package.
3. Risk handling is the process that
identifies, evaluates, selects, and implements options in order to set risk at acceptable levels given program
constraints and objectives. The DCMAC-C Mentor-Protégé Division performs risk
planning, assessing, monitoring and documenting, while contractors do the risk handling, because it is their process(es) that has to be changed in order to mitigate
risk. DCMA's role in contractor risk handling is
one of influence rather than control. Therefore,
the DCMAC-CP Program Manager
should ensure that their assessments are well founded and provide good reason for the supplier to
voluntarily act on these assessments.
4. Risk
Monitoring
4.1. The Mentor-Protégé Division Chief and Program
Mangers will review mentor reports and protégé responses
to
determine if corrective actions are required.
4.2. The DCMAC-CP Mentor-Protégé Division Chief and the Program Manager ensures all parts of the Annual Review and Executive Summary for DoD Mentor-Protégé
Agreements are completed. The DCMAC-CP Program Manger makes sure the review package is complete and contains all
the information required as oulined in the instructions (Instruction Sheet). The DCMAC-CP
Program Manger signs
the review and routes through the Mentor-Protégé
Division Chief for approval prior to making final
distribution.
4.3. Once
review approval is obtained, the DCMAC-CP Program Manager distributes the review packages to OSD OSBP, DCMAC-CP, and
applicable agencies. All reimbursable reviews
should be
distributed no later than 3 weeks prior to
funding requirements and credit agreements two weeks prior to end of performance period or
an earlier date
as established by the Mentor-Protégé Division Chief.
5. Risk
Documentation
5.1.
The DCMAC-CP Program Manager should record and maintain documentation on risk assessments, risk handling and risk monitoring results
and update as applicable.
5.2.
The DCMAC-CP Division Chief and Program Manager should maintain a listing
or spreadsheet of
the dates of reviews scheduled and when the
corresponding reports are received and approved. They
should prepare an executive summary of the performance
of the annual review requirement and make
recommendations for improvement.
5.3. DCMAC-CP
will follow-up with the OSD OSBP and other customers,
as required, to enhance DCMA's service to our customers
in support of the Mentor-Protégé
Program. |