| Revision: June 2008
Purpose
1.1 This instruction
describes DCMA policy for the support of Office of the
Secretary of Defense (OSD) level program reviews including the
Defense Acquisition Board (DAB), Defense Acquisition Executive
Summary (DAES), and Overarching Integrated Product Team
(OIPT). Adherence to this policy will ensure that each
OSD-level program review is fully vetted throughout the Agency
and with the appropriate customer representatives prior to a
scheduled event.
1.2 Implementation
of this policy will enable us to share information across the
Enterprise and promote transparency between Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology)
(DUSD(A&T)) office and DCMA.
Applicability
2.1 This
instruction applies to the Customer Management (DCMA-OCR) and
Performance Integration (DCMA-OCX) Divisions and their
respective Centers, and applicable Product Divisions and their
assigned primary and streamlined Contract Management Offices
(CMO).
2.2 All DCMA Divisions,
Product Divisions and CMOs shall support the preparation of
Agency principals for each event.
2.2.1 DAB. The DAB is the Department's senior-level forum for
advising the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) on critical
decisions concerning ACAT 1D and special interest programs.
The Board is chaired by the USD(AT&L).
The DCMA Director,
Deputy Director or their designee acts as the Agency
principal for this event.
2.2.2 DAES. The DAES review is the principal mechanism for tracking
programs between milestone reviews. A DAES report is
provided by the Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP)
Program Manager (PM) to the DUSD(A&T) each calendar
quarter. When a contract contains an Earned Value
Management (EVM) requirement, DCMA provides EV tripwires in
support of DAES reviews.
The DCMA Director, Deputy Director, Product Assurance and
Supply Chain Management Executive Director (DCMA-OC) or their
designee acts as the Agency principal for this
event.
2.2.3 OIPT. In
support of all Acquisition Category (ACAT) 1D and IAM, and
special interest programs, an OIPT is formed for each program
to provide oversight and review as that program proceeds
through its acquisition life-cycle. At a minimum, OIPTs
are composed of the PM, Program Executive Officer (PEO),
Component Staff, Joint Staff, USD(AT&L) staff, and the OSD
staff principals or their representatives involved in
oversight and review of a particular ACAT ID or IAM
program.
The appropriate Product Division Director or Deputy Director,
lead CMO Commander/Director, EVM Center Director (DCMAC-V),
Performance Integration Division Director (DCMA-OCX), or
DCMA-OC Executive Director acts as the Agency principal for
this event.
Changes
| Version dated December
2007 |
| Section |
Brief of
Change |
| All |
Identifies Agency principals for specific events,
incorporates additional references and process
flowchart, and identifies roles and responsibilities for
organizations supporting events |
| |
|
References
4.1 DODI
5000.2, Operation of the Defense Acquisition
System
4.2
DAB Calendar
4.3
Acquisition Decision Memorandum
4.4
Major
Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP)
4.5
EVM
4.6 DCMAC-V
DAES
Data Call Master Template, Rev 2007.
Procedures (flowchart)
5.1 Roles and
Responsibilities.
5.1.1 Overview.
DCMA Product Assurance and Supply Chain Management and
Contracts (DCMA-OC and -AQ) are the lead for OSD-level
customer engagement. The OSD Liaison will establish and
sustain relationships with the OSD organizations and
components responsible for program execution and analyses.
5.1.1.1 OSD Liaison. The OSD Liaison will
notify the EVM Center Director and the appropriate Product
Division Director's Action Group (DAG) and/or Operations
Directorate Director of changes to the DAB calendar within 24
hours of their receipt. When available, pre-event
intelligence regarding OSD-level customer expectations will be
shared with DCMA-OCX and the Product Divisions.
5.1.2 Customer
Management Division. DCMA-OCR is the lead for
customer engagement at the major buying commands (Customer
Liaison Center (DCMAC-P)) and PEO portfolio management
(Customer Relations Center (DCMAC-K)). DCMA-OCR will
maintain a current and accurate Major Defense Acquisition
Program (MDAP) milestone tracking system.
5.1.3 Earned Value
Management Center. DCMAC-V is the lead for internal
and external customer engagement on all EVM matters to include
tripwires, system validations and program analyses.
DCMAC-V will interface with the Product Divisions to collect
and analyze data required to support EVM
analyses.
5.1.3.1 Support Decision. The Director, DCMAC-V,
in coordination with the Director, DCMA-OCX, will decide
within three work days of receipt of the event notice on the
level of support, if any, required for upcoming DAB, DAES and
OIPT events.
If no support is required, DCMA-OCX will notify DCMA-OC of
their decision and post their rationale to the applicable
project on the Department of Defense (DoD) Engagement
Community.
If support is required, DCMAC-V will notify the cognizant
Product Division through their DAG and/or Operations
Directorate Director to enlist their support in working with
the affected CMOs. At a minimum, EV tripwire data shall
be provided for all DAES programs selected for review when an
EVM contractual requirement exists in the current
contracts.
5.1.4 Product Divisions. The applicable
Product Division is the lead for MDAP-related contract
management issues to include acquisition planning support
services, contract management, financial services, engineering
support services, quality assurance, product acceptance,
software acquisition management, small business and
specialized safety. As necessary, the Product Divisions
will coordinate issues with appropriate DCMA Centers and
across other Product Divisions.
5.1.4.1 Action Officers. Each Product
Division will assign a lead Action Officer (AO) to support
each OSD-level event: DAB, DAES Review and/or OIPT
Meeting. The AO will coordinate all required actions on
behalf of the Product Division and shall support any working
level meetings along with other DCMA representatives (where
appropriate). The AO will alert the Lead CMO Commander
of the upcoming OSD-level event, and request their
recommendation for the required support. When an event
is supported, the AO will request Lead CMO assistance to
develop the Program Assessment and Analysis (PAA) read-ahead
package.
5.1.4.1.1 Support Decision. The AO, in
coordination with the Product Division Director and Lead CMO
Commander, will decide within three work days of receipt of
the event notice on the level of support, if any, required for
upcoming DAB, DAES and OIPT events.
If no support is required, the AO will notify DCMA-OC of their
decision and post their rationale to the applicable project on
the DoD Engagement Community.
If support is required, the AO will notify DCMA-OC of their
decision and post their rationale to the applicable project on
the DoD Engagement Community. In addition, the AO will
coordinate with the EVM Center, Lead CMO and DCMAC-K to
assemble an enterprise-wide PAA read-ahead package at least 45
days prior to the OSD-level scheduled event.
5.1.4.1.2 Program Assessment and Analysis (PAA)
Package. The PAA will be in the form of a PowerPoint
presentation, and the completed product will be posted to the
program folder in the applicable project on the DoD Engagement
Community ten (10) business days in advance of the
event. At a minimum, the PAA will include:
- Program
Synopsis: Status, major milestones, current issues,
risk matrix and EV tripwire data for all DAES programs
when an EVM contractual requirement exists in the current
contracts, and
- Performance
Commitments (e.g., Agency Level, Program and/or EVM) and
status to include identification of DCMA impacts and areas
of influence.
Each Product Division
Director will define the level and detail of information they
deem appropriate to support the OSD-level event.
5.1.5 Lead CMO. The Lead CMO Commander
shall respond to the AO request for recommendation for support
and PAA assistance.
5.1.5.1 OSD-level Event Recommendation for
Support. The Lead CMO Commander, in coordination
with the Program Integrator and Program Manager, will
recommend, within two work days of the receipt of the event
notice the level of support, if any, required for upcoming
DAB, DAES and OIPT events.
At a minimum, the criteria to consider for event attendance
will include: program criticality and/or risk, EVM
status, Global War on Terror (GWOT) related impact, and
program visibility (Nunn-McCurdy (N-M) Breach or high level of
Congressional interest).
The response shall be in the form of a PowerPoint presentation
and/or white Paper, and include a recommendation of support or
no support. When support is recommended, the level of
recommended support must be stipulated. Typical
attendees are normally high ranking members (GS-15 and Senior
Executive Service (SES)) of the DCMA leadership team and event
based.
5.1.5.2 PAA Assistance. The Lead CMO will
facilitate the collection of enterprise-wide data and
information that will be used to generate a PAA read-ahead
package to prepare the designated Agency principal to attend
the OSD-level event. The read-ahead package will be
edited or augmented with new information as needed.
The Lead CMO should form a Review Team comprised of the AO,
DCMAC-V (as appropriate), DCMAC-K, and Program Integrator to
review all available programmatic information and seek input
from other DCMA functional communities as needed.
Supporting data, information and analyses for inclusion in the
PAA will be provided to the AO a minimum of 30 days prior to
the scheduled event.
The Lead CMO Commander will share the PAA read-ahead package
with the relevant PEO and PM or their designated
representative to promote collaboration with our
customer. Any requested changes to the package shall be
coordinated with the AO.
5.2 OSD-level Event
Attendance.
5.2.1 Attendee Expectations.
DAB and DAES
Reviews and OIPT Meetings are recurring events. It is
anticipated that the designated Agency principal will attend
the OSD-level scheduled event and share DCMA specific
programmatic risk based insight and communicate meeting
results to the Agency.
5.2.2 After Action
Report. Within three business days following the
actual event, the assigned AO will contact the attendee to
arrange for a de-briefing of significant observations, and
ensure any follow-up actions are identified, communicated,
assigned and closed.
The AO will generate an After Action
report (AAR) in Customer Engagement Recording Application
(CERA). Post support for each event is considered closed
once the AO generates the AAR in CERA.
Definitions
6.1 DAB. The
DAB is the Department's senior-level forum for advising the
USD(AT&L) on critical decisions concerning ACAT 1D and
special interest programs. The DAB is composed of the
Department's senior acquisition officials. The Board is
chaired by the USD(AT&L). The Vice Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff (VCJCS) serves as the vice chairman of
the Board. Other principal members of the Board include
the Under Secretary of Defense for Comptroller; the Under
Secretary of Defense for Policy; the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness; the Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence; the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for networks and Information Integration (ASD(NII)); the
Director of Operational Test and Evaluation; the Director of
Program Analysis and Evaluation; the Secretaries of the Army,
Navy and Air Force; and the DAB Executive Secretary (Director,
Acquisition Resources and Analysis (AAR)).
The DAB Chairman is also routinely
supported by senior functional advisors, such as, but not
limited to, the Primary Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for
AT&L; the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics
and Material Readiness; the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
for Industrial Policy; the Director of International
Cooperation; the Director of Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy; the Director of Defense Research and
Engineering; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Legislative Affairs; the OIPT leader from Defense Systems; the
OIPT Leader from NII; the Acquisition Executives from the
Army, Navy, and Air Force; the PM; the PEO; the Chairman of
the Cost Analysis and Improvement Group; the USD(AT&L)
Special Assistant; the Deputy General Counsel for Acquisition
and Logistics; and a representative from the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Other senior Defense
officials may be invited by the USD(AT&L) to participate
in DAB meetings on an as-needed basis.
6.2 DAES. DAES is the
principal mechanism for tracking programs between milestone
reviews. A DAES report is provided by the MDAP PM to the
USD(A&T) each calendar quarter.
The DAES process is both a reporting and
review process. It serves two primary purposes: to
provide progress information to DoD principals on the MDAPs
and to provide feedback on OSD staff views to the DoD
acquisition community.
Within OSD, the Director, AAR is
responsible for managing the DAES process. The executing
organization within AAR is Acquisition Management (AM), to
which the DAES team is assigned.
The purpose of the DAES review process is
to provide timely information to the DoD acquisition hierarchy
on MDAP program execution and progress, policy decisions, and
early problem identification. The PM is held accountable
for the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of the
quarterly DAES report. The report passes through the PEO
and Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) and is received in
OUSD(AT&L)ARA/AM for distribution to the several OSD
staffs involved with acquisition oversight. The OSD
staff organizations then prepare assessments on each
program.
After program assessments are complete
(about two weeks), the DAES team consolidates the information
and recommends an agenda to the Director, AAR based on the
issues identified during this OSD staff review. The
programs on the approved agenda are reviewed at a monthly
meeting held by the USD(AT&L) and other key DoD
acquisition executives. All assessments prepared for all
programs reviewed each month are summarized in the DAES
feedback package. The OSD staff review, USD(AT&L)
meeting, and feedback to the field form the core of the DAES
process.
6.3 OIPT. In support of all
Acquisition Category (ACAT) 1D and IAM, and special interest
programs, an OIPT is formed for each program to provide
oversight and review as that program proceeds through its
acquisition life-cycle. The OIPT for ACAT 1D programs is
led by the appropriate Office of the Secretary of Defense
(OSD) official (typically the Director, Defense Systems, the
Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for C3ISR and
Information Technology Acquisition, or the Deputy to the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Chemical Demilitarization
& Threat Reduction), depending on the program in
question). The OIPT leader for each ACAT IAM program is
the Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for C3ISR and
Information Technology Acquisition. At a minimum, OIPTs
are composed of the PM, PEO, Component Staff, Joint Staff,
USD(AT&L) staff, and the OSD staff principals or their
representatives involved in oversight and review of a
particular ACAT ID or IAM program.
The OIPT first
meets upon learning that a program is intended to be initiated
to determine the extent of working-level IPT support needed
for the potential program, who shall participate on the
working-level IPTs, the appropriate milestone for program
initiation, and the mandatory information needed for the
program initiation review. OIPTs meet as necessary over
the life of a program. The OIPT leader holds a meeting
to resolve issues when requested by any member of the OIPT, or
when directed by the USD(AT&L). The goal of these
meetings is to resolve as many issues and concerns at the
lowest level possible, and to escalate issues that need
resolution at a higher level, bringing only the highest level
issues to the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) for
decision.
In support of a
planned milestone review by the DAB or Major Automated
Information System Review Council (MAISRC), the OIPT normally
convenes two weeks in advance of the anticipated review to
re-assess the tailored documentation required for the upcoming
milestone, ensure the evolving acquisition strategy is sound,
assess the progress being made by the working-level IPTs, and
determine whether the program is ready for the milestone
review when planned. The OIPT leader, in coordination
with the appropriate CAE, recommends to the MDA whether the
anticipated review shall go forward as planned.
The OIPT leader
for ACAT 1D or IAM programs provides an independent assessment
to the DAB or MAISRC chairs, principals, and advisors at major
program reviews and/or milestone decision reviews using
information gathered through the IPT process. The
leader's assessment focuses on core acquisition management
issues and takes account of assessments prepared by OIPT
members. Assessments will normally be provided by the
members of the OIPT. There should be no surprises at
this point because all team members are working the issues in
real time, and should be knowledgeable of the independent
assessment.
Forms
7.1 CERA (reference
5.2.2) is an e-Tools application that provides a vehicle to
record DCMA's interactions with customers in an Agency-wide
database.
|