The scope and complexity of DCMA participation will vary depending upon the type of contract involved. The following are special considerations that need to be addressed during the initial review and planning process. The information is grouped by fixed price contracts, cost type contracts and "other" types of contracts such as letter contracts or orders issued under Basic Ordering Agreements.
FIXED-PRICE
CONTRACTS:
1. Firm-Fixed-Price
contracts are used when a fair and reasonable price can be established at the
outset. The Government pays the negotiated amount regardless of the contractor’s
real cost. This contract type is preferred to all others because it encourages
the contractor to contain costs. Pay special attention to the
progress
payment clause if applicable. Refer to Progress Payments
guidance.
1.1. References:
1.1.1.
FAR
32.500, Progress Payments Based on Costs
1.1.2. DFARS
232.5, Progress Payments Based on Costs
1.1.3. FAR 52.232-13, Notice of Progress
Payments.
1.1.4. FAR
52.232-14, Notice of Availability of Progress Payments Exclusively for Small
Business Concerns
1.1.5. FAR
52.232-16, Progress Payments.
2. Fixed-Price Incentive contracts are used when the parties can negotiate a target cost, target profit and a ceiling price that provides for the contractor to assume an appropriate share of the risk. Pay special attention to the incentive arrangement/formula, any funds status reports such as the Contractor Performance Report, the progress payment clause, and the Quarterly Limitation on Payments Statements (QLOPS) (refer to FAR 52.216-16 and FAR 52.216-17). QLOPS are submitted within 45 days after the end of each quarter beginning with the quarter in which delivery is first made and accepted and continuing until negotiation of the final contract price. Establish a control record on the QLOP Statements and maintain it in Part 5 of the Official Contract File. The ACO is authorized to withhold payment if the contractor does not submit this report on time. Note, that FAC 97-16 removed the requirement for contracting officers to review quarterly statements, therefore, DCMA personnel are no longer required to compare QLOPS with progress payment requests. Note also that if a fixed-price incentive contract was awarded after August 31, 1998, and is funded with multiple appropriations, special requirements for progress payment distribution apply. See paragraph 8.2 of the Progress Payments Guidebook.
2.1. References:
2.1.1.
FAR
16.4, Incentive Contracts
2.1.2.
FAR
32.500, Progress Payments Based on Costs
2.1.3.
FAR
32.606, Debt Determination and Collection
2.1.4.
FAR
32.610, Demand for Payment of Contract Debt
2.1.5.
FAR
32.613, Deferment of Collection
2.1.6.
FAR
32.700, Contract Funding
2.1.7.
FAR
42.500, Postaward Orientation
2.1.8. DFARS
216.4, Incentive Contracts
2.1.9. DFARS
232.5, Progress Payments Based on Costs
3. Fixed-Price with Economic Price Adjustment contracts are
used to protect the contractor and the Government against significant economic
fluctuations in labor or material costs during the period of contract
performance. EPAs are based on established catalog or market prices,
actual costs, or cost indices of labor or material. At the end of contract
performance, the contractor submits an EPA proposal which the ACO evaluates in
order to arrive at a reasonable negotiation position. The contractor is required
to certify that all price decreases have been applied and the ACO is responsible
for verifying the contractor’s certification as well as the application of all
required price decreases.
4. Fixed-Price Redetermination contracts are either prospective or retroactive. The prospective type is used when it is possible to negotiate a fair and reasonable price for an initial period but not for subsequent periods. The initial portion of the contract is firm fixed price and will be the longest period possible. The price for subsequent periods is determined through negotiation after completion of the contract and will be for at least 12 months. The retroactive type is used when it is not possible to negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the entire contract period. A ceiling price is established and final price is determined through negotiation after completion of the contract. Pay special attention to the progress payment clause and the Quarterly Limitation on Payments Reports (refer to FAR 52.216-16 and FAR 52.216-17).
4.1. References:
4.1.1.
FAR
16.4, Incentive Contracts
4.1.2.
FAR
32.500, Progress Payments Based on Costs
4.1.3.
FAR
32.606, Debt Determination and Collection
4.1.4.
FAR
32.610, Demand for Payment of Contract Debt
4.1.5.
FAR
32.613, Deferment of Collection
4.1.6.
FAR
32.700, Contract Funding
4.1.7.
FAR
42.500, Postaward Orientation
4.1.8. DFARS
216.4, Incentive Contracts
5. Fixed-Price/Level-of-Effort contracts are used to purchase a specified level of effort over a stated period of time. This type of contract is not considered a predominant contract type. Pay special attention to surveillance of the contractor through analyses of status reports and audit of the contractor’s billings, especially the final billing.
5.1. References:
5.1.1.
FAR
42.302(a)(65), Accomplish Administrative Closeout Procedures
5.1.2.
FAR
16.207, Firm-Fixed-Price, Level-of-Effort Term Contracts
6. COST CONTRACTS:
6.1. Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee contracts are used
when there are enough uncertainties involved in contract performance to preclude
using a fixed price contract. Pay special attention to the Limitation of
Cost/Funds clause as well as the contractor’s funds status reports that are
identified in the contract. Even though DCAA signs the contractor’s requests for
payment, the ACO can at any time during contract performance request an audit of
the contractor’s vouchers. The ACO is responsible for monitoring the
contractor’s expenditures. The contractor’s invoices may be submitted not
more than twice monthly.
6.1.2. References:
6.1.2.1.
FAR
32.700, Contract Funding
6.1.2.2. FAR
52.232-20, Limitation of Cost
6.1.2.3. FAR
52.232-21, Limitation of Cost (Facilities)
6.1.2.4. FAR
52.232-22, Limitation of Funds
6.2. Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee and Redeterminable Contracts are used to encourage contractors by providing greater profits through cost savings and/or other performance improvements. Pay special attention to the incentive provisions, funds status reports, and limitation of cost/funds provisions. A Postaward Orientation Conference is helpful if the contractor is new to the incentive provisions.
6.2.1. References:
6.2.1.1.
FAR
16.4, Incentive Contracts
6.2.1.2.
FAR
32.606, Debt Determination and Collection
6.2.1.3.
FAR
32.610, Demand for Payment of Contract Debt
6.2.1.4.
FAR
32.613, Deferment of Collection
6.2.1.5.
FAR
32.700, Contract Funding
6.2.1.6.
FAR
42.500, Postaward Orientation
6.2.1.7. DFARS
216.4, Incentive Contracts
6.2.1.8. Contract Pricing
Reference Guides
6.2.1.9. Pricing and Negotiation
Instructions & Guidebook
6.3. Cost-Plus-Award-Fee contracts are used to provide additional incentive to contractors to achieve excellence in areas such as quality, timeliness, technical ingenuity, and cost effective management. Pay special attention to the Award Fee criteria and the rating plan. The contract will provide for interim rating periods during contract performance. DCMA may add value to the Award Fee Evaluation by providing timely input to the Program Manager on observations with regard to the stated criteria.
6.4. Cost Sharing contracts are used when the Government pays only a portion of the allowable costs and no fee. This kind of contract is used for R&D work from which the contractor will derive a substantial commercial benefit; such as, the development of Teflon.
7. OTHER TYPES OF CONTRACTS:
7.1. Letter contracts are used when the
Government’s interests demand that the contractor be given a binding commitment
so that work can start immediately, and negotiating a definitive contract is not
possible in sufficient time to meet the requirement. Pay special attention to
the contractor’s compliance with the definitization schedule and inform the PCO
of any anticipated delays. Monitor the contractor’s expenditures and percentage
of completion and assure that the limitations established by the PCO are not
exceeded. Team with the PCO and offer our services to obtain, review and
evaluate the contractor’s proposal for use in negotiating the final
contract. Special
considerations apply when making payments under undefinitized contract
actions.
7.1.1. References:
7.1.1.1.
DFARS 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements
7.1.1.2. DCAA Manual 7640.1, Chapter 5-1000 Section
10
7.1.1.3. DoD Directive
7640.2, Contract Audit Follow-up (CAFU)
7.1.1.4. Field Pricing
Support
7.2. Time-and-Material (T&M) contracts and Labor Hour (LH) contracts are used when it is not possible to estimate accurately the extent or duration of the work or to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. The T&M and LH contracts provide no incentive to the contractor for cost control; therefore, perform surveillance on the contractor to assure that the contractor is performing efficiently and using effective cost control measures. Immediately after award, convene a government meeting with appropriate functional elements to establish a surveillance plan. This plan includes performance of periodic audits of contractor’s billings and periodic floor checks. Pay special attention to the withhold applicable to the contractor’s billings and review paid and rejected vouchers in accordance with the requirements of the Public Vouchers guidebook. Billings are made by public voucher in accordance with the requirements of the Public Vouchers guidebook. The ACO is responsible for approving the final voucher in accordance with the Public Vouchers guidebook.
7.2.1. References:
7.2.1.1.
FAR
16.601, Time-and-materials contracts
7.2.1.2.
FAR
16.602, Labor-hour contracts
7.2.1.3.
FAR
42.302(a)(7), Determine allowability of costs and approve final
vouchers
7.2.1.4.
FAR
42.302(a)(9), Establish final indirect cost rates
7.2.1.5.
FAR
42.302(a)(65), Accomplish administrative closeout
7.2.1.6. FAR
52.232-7, Payments under Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour
Contracts
7.2.1.7. DFARS
242.803(b), Auditor receipt of voucher
7.2.1.8. Briefing -
T&M and LH Contracts
7.3. Orders issued against Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs) and Indefinite-Delivery Type Contracts (IDTCs) are priced or unpriced. Both instruments allow orders to be issued against them; however, the BOA is not a contract and the IDTC is a contract. The BOA contains pricing methods, terms and conditions, and a description of the supplies or services to be provided. The IDTC is a contract where exact times and/or quantities for future deliveries cannot be determined at the time of award. When delegated authority to definitize unpriced orders, complete negotiations within the 180 day timeframe. Monitor contractual progress to ensure that payments will not exceed 50% of the not-to-exceed price or 75% of a qualified proposal prior to negotiations. Refer to Contract Pricing guidance. Special considerations apply when making payments under undefinitized contract actions.
Click on Tank Automotive Command (TACOM) for guidance on orders issued from TACOM's Direct Vendor Delivery System.
7.3.1. References:
7.3.1.1.
FAR
16.5, Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
7.3.1.2.
FAR
16.703, Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs)
7.3.1.3.
FAR
53.105, Computer Generation
7.3.1.4.
FAR
53.2, Prescriptions of Forms
7.3.1.5.
FAR
53.243, Contract Modifications
7.3.1.6. DFARS
216.5, Indefinite Delivery Contracts
7.3.1.7. DFARS
216.703, Basic Ordering Agreements
7.3.1.8. DFARS
217.74, Undefinitized Contractual Actions
7.3.1.9. DFARS
217.7404,
Limitation on Expenditures
7.3.1.10. DFARS
253.2,
Prescription of Forms
7.3.1.11. Contract Pricing
Reference Guides
7.4. Contract
Modifications may be either bilateral or unilateral. A bilateral
modification is signed by both the contractor and the contracting officer and
used to make negotiated equitable adjustments resulting from the issuance of a
change order, to definitize letter contracts, and to reflect other agreements of
the parties modifying the terms of a contract. A unilateral modification is a
modification signed only by the contracting officer and used to make
administrative changes (FAR
43.101), issue change orders, issue termination notices, and make changes
authorized by clauses such as the Options clause and the Suspension of Work
clause. Modifications may be issued by the PCO or the ACO. Refer to
Contract Pricing
guidance for instructions on definitizing modifications.
7.4.1.
Modifications can be processed in one of three ways:
7.4.1.1. A modification
to a single contract.
7.4.1.2. A manual modification to a group of contracts
hereafter referred to as a “class” modification.
7.4.1.3. A computer
generated ARZ modification to a group of contracts. ARZ modifications can
only be used for modifications that do not change MOCAS data elements. (MOCAS Transfer
Process/ARZ Modifications)
7.4.2. Class or ARZ modifications are used
for plant-wide contract changes such as:
7.4.2.1. Name/Address
changes
7.4.2.2. Novation Agreements
7.4.2.3. SPI Block
Changes
7.4.3. Post all ACO issued modifications to the DoD Electronic
Document Access (EDA) Website. There are three methods for posting a
modification on EDA: use of the MDO eTool, scanning a hard copy
document, or importing an electronic file.
7.4.4. . The contracting officer will obtain and document
adequate consideration for changed contract requirements. Consideration
may take the form of a contract price adjustment or other means commensurate
with the change in requirements such as expedited delivery; product quality
improvements; performance improvements; additional products and services, where
legally permissible; improved reliability, maintainability, supportability,
producability or warranties; conversion to best practices or performance
requirements; insertion of commercial products and services into defense unique
commodities; reduction in overhead and infrastructure; ensuring subcontractor
conversions to best practices; and reduction in Government oversight
requirements. Sample
consideration language may be used to document the consideration
decision.
7.4.5. Global Modifications (Blanket Modification
for Enhancement of AFMC Automated Systems for Contract Depot Maintenance
Activities (INFORMATION))
7.4.6.1. A global modification or
blanket no-cost change order is issued to modify a large number of contracts
involving multiple companies. This approach is used in cases where it’s
more efficient or practical than having individual ACOs across the Agency issue
substantially identical modifications. This approach is employed
when:
7.4.6.1.1. Effective delegation of contracting authority from the
affected Defense Departments and Agencies has been received by Headquarters,
DCMA;
7.4.6.1.2. The modification will not change the contract
value;
7.4.6.1.3. The modification will be unilateral;
and,
7.4.6.1.4. Its use has been approved by the DCMA Director or
Senior Procurement Executive.
7.4.6.2. Use of this approach may often
require action by DCMA ACOs (e.g., distribution of modifications to contractors
and Procuring Contracting Officers, negotiation of supplemental agreements if
suppliers reject “no-cost” change orders and request equitable
adjustments). Requirements and responsibilities for handling a global
modification will be specified in a Tasking Memorandum to the CMO.
Publish all ACO issued modifications on the Internet World Wide Web (WWW). There are three methods for publishing a modification on the WWW: use of the MDO eTool, scanning a hard copy document, or importing an electronic file. Each method is described in the attachment.
7.4.7. References:
7.4.7.1.
FAR
42.302(a) and (b), Contract Administration Functions
7.4.7.2.
FAR
43, Contract Modifications
7.4.7.3.
FAR
43.2, Change Orders
7.4.7.4. FAR
52.243-4, Changes
7.4.7.5. DFARS
243, Contract Modifications
7.4.7.6. DFARS
243.2, Change Orders
7.5. Commercial Contracts are used as a result of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 and DCMA can perform Contract Administration Services (CAS) on commercial contracts. Commercial contracts rely on the contractors’ existing quality assurance system as a substitute for Government in-process inspection and testing. DCMA may perform in process inspection only if it is a customary market practice and only if the PCO has included an addendum to the contract specifically tasking these inspections. Current information and resources:
Commercial contracting is appropriate for Early CAS involvement by contract administration personnel. Commercial requirements intended to be administered by DCMA will be reviewed whenever possible to ensure that the resulting contract will contain clear, easily understood procedures for item acceptance and for payment. Payment provisions should be reviewed to ensure that they are compatible with FAR 32.2 including being customary in the commercial market place for the item being acquired. Since commercial item financing and payment provisions can vary depending on commercial practice, contract management personnel will be alert to terms and conditions which may require close monitoring.
Commercial contracts are designated in the Mechanization of Contract Administration Services (MOCAS) system with the R9 Remark 48 code for easy identification of these instruments. ACOs should be particularly aware of their commercial item workload, including that in MOCAS Contract Administration Report (CAR) Part B, since it will probably require intense interaction with DFAS and with contractors unfamiliar with these procedures. Contract administration personnel should be very proactive in performing postaward orientation, either by conference, letter or telephone, for commercial item contracts, particularly when the contract is the first of its type with the given contractor.
8. NON-PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENTS:
Non-Procurement instruments fall into three basic
types: grants, cooperative agreements, and other transactions. A related class
of instrument is the Technology Investment Agreement (TIA) which may be either a
cooperative agreement or an other transaction. Other
Transactions and TIAs which are delegated to DCMA for administration will be
assigned to CMOs throughout DCMA.
8.1. Grants and Cooperative Agreements are used when the principal purpose of the relationship is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient in order to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation, as authorized by US law. This differs from contracts which usually involve the acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Government. Grants are to be used when substantial involvement between the DoD and the recipient is not expected when carrying out the activity contemplated in the agreement. Cooperative Agreements are used when substantial involvement is expected between the DoD and the recipient when carrying out the contemplated activity. Grants are indicated by a "1" in the 9th position of the instrument number. Cooperative agreements are indicated by a "2" in the 9th position of the instrument number. Grants and Cooperative Agreements can be awarded to commercial organizations, nonprofit entities, and educational institutions. Cooperative Agreements are used with entities that furnish procurement technical assistance to businesses. Grants and Cooperative Agreements are legal instruments but they are not contracts and they are not subject to the FAR; however, they are subject to the DoD Grants and Agreements Regulatory System (DoDGARs). Only Administrative Grants Officers (AGOs) are authorized to administer grants and cooperative agreements. Upon receipt of a Grant or a Cooperative Agreement, the CMO team should meet and determine the extent of surveillance to be performed. The CMO team should also advise nonprofit recipients of certain requirements concerning competition in procurement of audit services, and the treatment of rebates related to allowable charges against Government awards. Attached is information concerning procurement of audit services for recipients of grants and cooperative agreements.
8.1.1. References:
8.1.1.1. DoD
3210.6-R,Department of Defense Grants Regulations
8.1.1.2. OMB Circular
A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments
8.1.1.3. OMB Circular
A-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local
Governments
8.1.1.4. OMB Circular
A-110, Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations
8.1.1.5. OMB Circular
A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations
8.1.1.6. OMB Circular
A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations
8.2. Other Transactions (OTs): Public Law 10 U.S.C. 2371 provides the Department of Defense authority to enter into transactions (other than contracts, cooperative agreements and grants) for certain projects. Consequently, other transactions are defined by what they are not, rather than what they are. Any instrument that is not a contract, cooperative agreement, or grant is considered an "other transaction". The two types of other transactions that are likely to be assigned to DCMA for administration are OTs for research and OTs for prototype. OTs for research are designated by a "3" in the 9th position of the instrument number. OTs for prototypes awarded after October 1, 1997 are designated by a "9" in the 9th position of the instrument number. OTs are not covered by the FAR or its supplements, and are meant to be flexible instruments. The terms and conditions of individual agreements can vary greatly from one instance to another in support of individual program objectives. Only Administrative Agreements Officers (AAOs) are authorized to administer OTs. OTs delegated to DCMA for administration are assigned to CMOs throughout the Agency.
8.3. Technology Investment Agreements (TIAs): TIAs are a class of assistance instruments that may be used to carry out basic, applied, and advance research projects when it is appropriate to use assistance instruments, and the research is to be performed by a for-profit firm, or by consortia that include a for-profit firm. TIAs replaced two types of assistance instruments: "consortium agreements", a type of OT used by the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and "cooperative agreements under 10 U.S.C. 2371", addressed in Part 37 of the 1994 Draft Interim Guidance DoDGARs, and also referred to as "flexible cooperative agreements". A TIA is a type of cooperative agreement (awarded under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2358) when its patent rights provision complies with the Bayh-Dole statute (Chapter 18 of Title 35, U.S.C.). A TIA is a type of other transaction (awarded under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2371) when its patent rights provision is less restrictive than is possible under Bayh-Dole. An OTs for prototype is not covered under the TIA classification. TIAs are also administered by CMOs throughout DCMA offices. Both the DODGARS and Supplemental Revision 2, February 3, 1999 to the DoDGARs govern TIAs. Only Administrative Agreements Officers (AAOs) are authorized to administer TIAs.
8.3.1. References:
8.3.1.1. DoD
3210.6-R,Department of Defense Grants Regulations
8.3.1.2. OMB Circular
A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments
8.3.1.3. OMB Circular
A-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local
Governments
8.3.1.4. OMB Circular
A-110, Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations
8.3.1.5. OMB Circular
A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations
8.3.1.6. OMB Circular
A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations
8.3.1.7. Section 845 Other Transaction
Authority
8.3.1.8. Guidance on Technology
Investment Agreements, General Discussion
8.3.1.9. Revision 2 to Guidance on
Technology Investment Agreements
8.3.1.10. Defense
Grant and Agreement Circular 94-7
8.3.1.11. Section
I.E of the DDR&E February 4, 1994 Memorandum
8.3.1.12. Part 37 of the DoD Grant
and Agreement Regulations
8.3.1.13. Part 34 of the DoD Grant
and Agreement Regulations
8.3.1.14. DCAA
Audit Guidance on Evaluation of Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs)